in Eph 3, trans. Timothy O'Malley, Copyright 2023 [21] Theodore of Mopsuestia, catech. We owe the Lord as much attention to detail. Take this from someone who receives in the hand sometimes, I would never do it if I thought it was enabling Lucifer to corrupt my soul. Some may choose to receive the Lord on the tongue while others choose to receive in the hand. The most ancient practice of distributing Holy Communion was, with all probability, to give Communion to the faithful in the palm of the hand. Maybe this is due to its similarity to practices in most Protestant churches, many of which (Anglicans and Lutherans notwithstanding) fundamentally dont believe in a sacramental Communion substance. You should thus draw near with great awe and love, according to the greatness of that which is given: with awe, because of the greatness of (its) honour; and with love, because of (its) grace. awr. When permitted, the choice as to the form of reception falls upon the communicant and not upon the priest. Surveys from CARA and Pew reflect this, though I admittedly doubted them until I attended mass with a fellow Catholic at church that predominantly received on the tongue and my friend jeering remarked, why dont they receive in the hand like normal people? But one should not by his own judgment abstain from or return to communion, as he pleases. Greg., Dial., I, III, c. iii). But back in the West, where most of us at PT are from, the Church is struggling. The option offered to the faithful of receiving the Eucharistic bread in their hand and putting it into their own mouth must not turn out to be the occasion for regarding it as ordinary bread or as just another religious article. To lessen our evil inclinations. Gross Alexander NPNF 13, ed. Bishops who have been permitted to introduce the new rite of communion are asked to send a report to the congregation, six months hence, on the outcome. Pope Paul Vl approved this Instruction, confirmed it with his authority, and ordered its publication, setting the day of publication as its effective date. There is so much to Communion. I did an internet search about the history of communion in the hand in the U.S. and the only thing I found was an article by the NLM. 895. W.R., Goa, India. Q. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCBs) mission is to encounter the mercy of Christ and to accompany His people with joy. If Communion is given only under the species of bread, the Priest raises the host slightly and shows it to each, saying, The Body of Christ. This reply aged like Milk (currently January 2022). My overarching point in all this (as someone who receives comfortably in both manners) is that I dont think common concerns with reception in the hand have been treated with adequate seriousness by many its defenders. 6. OF THE SUPREME PONTIFF. To fit our bodies for a glorious resurrection. Theres no simple solution to this issue. Because Catholics believe that the celebration of the Eucharist is a sign of the reality of the oneness of faith, life, and worship, members of those churches with whom we are not yet fully united are ordinarily not admitted to Holy Communion. The rationale for Communion on the hands being an ancient practice is from St. Cyril of Jerusalem. Why did Christ institute the Holy Eucharist? The liturgical assembly of the baptized that comes together for the celebration of the Eucharist is a witness to, a manifestation of, the pilgrim Church. The author claims that Communion in the hand could only be authorized in countries where it was an established practice but doesnt give a citation. It should be noted that it is never permissible for a person to dip the host he or she has received into the chalice. The restorers of the rite probably had the beautiful simplicity and symbolism of the medieval rite in mind but did not take the changed circumstances sufficiently into account. My country is not on this list but holy communion is the norm. The same Instruction contained a reminder that the laws of the Church and the writings of the Fathers give ample witness of a supreme reverence and utmost caution toward the Eucharist and that this must continue. [11] Council of Constantinople in Trullo, canon 101. Alphonse Mingana (Gorgias Press: Piscataway, NJ, 2009 [1933]). I wholeheartedly agree with your comment on another thread that this ongoing discussion is frivolous and is only causing needless division. Most often when speaking of reverence, however, the Fathers emphasize two main things: 1) that every precaution should be taken lest the Eucharist fall to the ground and 2) that communicants should be from serious sin and quarrels with other Christians. Interestingly, during the Middle Ages, the reception of Holy Communion was restricted to "on the tongue" because of abuses. For this alone is the eating referred to by our Lord ( John 6:58 ). What if our way of calling our fellow Christians to a higher way were based on loving example and not polemics? The guidelines, which are to be included in missalettes and other participation aids published in the United States, seek to remind all those who may attend Catholic liturgies of the present discipline of the Church with regard to the sharing of Eucharistic Communion. I dont read any statement with canonical force saying that only those countries may apply for an indult. Instead of receiving in my hand, thinking "the other way is better," and quickly gobbling up the Eucharist, I took the "popular way," as a gift: I put my left hand on top of my right . The traditional and preferred method is the reception of the Host on the tongue: Step forward and kneel at the Communion rail or station (if you stand, make a sign of reverencesuch as a bow or genuflection or Sign of the Crossbefore receiving the Host and take care not to disrupt the Communion line). The faithful must be taught that Jesus Christ is Lord and Savior and that therefore the worship of latria or adoration belonging to God is owed to Christ present in this sacrament. For this reason, since the question of Communion in the hand is not a question of faith as such, and it has been approved by the legitimate authority, I do not believe that a priest can invoke conscience as a motive for refusing to apply a legitimate law. [5] In Jerusalem, we have the mystagogical catecheses of Cyril of Jerusalem (or perhaps of his successor, John). Do we accept an experience of the Real Presence only when the externals and the lingo of 1950 are seen and heard? [5] John Climacus, Ladder of Divine Ascent 28. The host will then be laid in the palm of the left hand and then taken by the right hand to the mouth. Fr. The Council of Saragossa, 380, excommunicated anyone who dared continue to receive Holy Communion in the hand. We pray that our common baptism and the action of the Holy Spirit in this Eucharist will draw us closer to one another and begin to dispel the sad divisions which separate us. In the case of communion under both kinds by way of intinction, it is never permitted to place on the hand of the communicant the host that has been dipped in the Lords blood.. The divine coal is a common image of the Eucharist in Syrian theology. There is also evidence that this was a contested subject (i.e., about what sins prevent someone from receiving), as it would continue to be throughout the history of the Church. At the same time he has taken into account the reasons given to support your request and the outcome of the vote taken on this matter. They would find many more areas we all need to work on than just their main focus. The Pope grants that throughout the territory of your conference, each bishop may, according to his prudent judgment and conscience, authorize in his diocese the introduction of the new rite for giving communion. After stipulating the historical practice of Communion in the hand, Memoriale Domini: defends the development of discipline that led to Communion on the tongue [6] In Syria (what we now call Turkey and surrounding regions) it is witnessed by Basil the Great,[7] John Chrysostom,[8] Theodore of Mopsuestia,[9] John Damascene[10] and the Council of Constantinople in Trullo (also called the Quinisext council). The guidelines recommend against serving Communion until gatherings of more than 50 people are allowed. England and Wales, 6 March 1976 [T]hose who restrict communicants to receive Holy Communion only in the hands are acting against the norms, as are those who refuse to Christ's faithful [the right] to receive Communion in the hand in dioceses that enjoy this indult. (or: Which Heresy Will You Give Up for Lent? Many pathogens are transmitted through the hands. It is not appropriate to reach out with the fingers and take the host from the person distributing. I quite deliberately eschewed entering the historical argument as it would have digressed from the main point of that article. The history of the liturgy, however, makes clear that rather early on a . A. Christ instituted the Holy Eucharist: Fast forward to 2004, when The Congregation for Divine Worship in its new Instruction named Redemptionis Sacramentum, stated: "Although each of the faithful always has the right to receive Holy Communion on the tongue, at his choice, if any communicant should wish to receive the Sacrament in the hand the sacred host is to be administered . Scotland, 7 July 1977 The faithful receive Communion kneeling or standing, as established by the episcopal conference. In this case, the person is to be mindful of the obligation to make an act of perfect contrition, including the intention of confessing as soon as possible (canon 916). That rhetorical flow and its further implicit objections (i.e., take care lest XYZ) *could* be a setup for a generous grant of indults, but given the overall negative tone I dont think it accidental or inconsequential that the prospect of permission is only mentioned in these cases where contrary practice already prevails. 3. Communion in the hand is legitimate only where permitted, and it remains in the realm of a permission. [27] John Chrysostom, Baptismal Instruction, 12.15-16, trans. Even if we presume the authenticity of the text we still do not know how long the practice lasted, whether leavened or unleavened bread was used and whether the practice was exclusive to the Church of Jerusalem. FYI, the announcement that approval for Communion in the Hand was given (in 1969) to Belgium, France, Germany, Holland, and Chad appeared in Notitiae in v. 6 (1969), no. We should weigh very well the matters in which we appeal to conscience. However, while this text is undoubtedly ancient evidence of the existence of Communion in the hand, it is, like many patristic texts, fraught with interpretative conundrums. What is the proper way of receiving Communion in the hand? He said that he had checked with the then Apostolic Delegation and had been assured that the pope was giving the boy a rosary. The infamous coffee cup masses Dorothy Day describes in her book may have had good intentions behind them, but the way they appeared to trivialize the Holy Sacrifice of the mass lent no dignity to the then new Pauline mass. I used the wordnecessarilyas an equivalent to in and of itself. There is no inherent reason why Communion in the hand is less reverent. St. Pray Tell here documents two statements of the Congregation for Divine Worship issued under Pope Paul VI. Other way round, it was in the hand and changed to the tongue circa 900 in the west. But such as, instead of their hands, make vessels of gold or other materials for the reception of the divine gift, and by these receive the immaculate communion, we by no means allow to come, as preferring inanimate and inferior matter to the image of God.[24]. awr. awr. In such cases, episcopal conferences should examine matters carefully and should make whatever decisions, by a secret vote and with a two-thirds majority, are needed to regulate matters. It also rules out arguing for an intrinsic link between a rejection of the true presence and communion in the handthe Fathers, on the whole, speak of Christs presence in the Eucharist in highly realistic terms and also received on the hand. That the conference had voted twice but failed to approve the practice and then only won the third vote by gathering absentee votes which is the article claims was unlawful? The faithful should consume the host before returning to their place; the ministers part will be brought out by use of the usual formulary, The body of Christ, to which the communicant replies: Amen. Permission for administering Communion in the hand was granted by the Holy See to the following countries and regions under Pope Paul VI:[UPDATED 3-2-18], Belgium, 31 May 1969 For one who eats unworthily eats and drinks to his own condemnation (1 Cor 11:29). All who are not receiving Holy Communion are encouraged to express in their hearts a prayerful desire for unity with the Lord Jesus and with one another. At the same time he has taken into account the reasons given to support your request and the outcome of the vote taken on this matter. The sad fact that in recent years hosts consecrated by a Pope have been offered for sale on the Internet further motivates this precautionary measure. Part 4. The very idea of people regularly receiving Communion (and even receiving Communion as part of the liturgy to the Eucharist itself) were relatively new ideas at the time of the Council. So it is not just tiresome traditionalists who worry about particles.
Keeping Chickens In Broward County, Articles OTHER